Daggett's Scoping Meeting
Was Another County Sham

The bare-bones meeting couldn't get any leaner
on the information provided.  Obviously, a ploy to keep the public uninformed.

Despite the project's filing containing hundreds of pages, LUSD Planning Director, Terri Rahhal, refuses to extend the time to submit written Scoping comments 60-days so that the public can review the data and better inform themselves.

Posted: April 15, 2018

Scoping meeting.

    Despite the apathy for civic events in the Silver Valley, the Daggett Community Center was moderately filled with approximately 50-residents for the County's Land Use Services' Scoping meeting held Wednesday afternoon, April 11, 2018.

    Representatives for the County and the solar developer opened the meeting with a very brief description of the proposed 3,500-acre photovoltaic project.  The superficial description of the massive project provided little information.

    The short presentation did not address any of the environmental issues for the environmental meeting nor any mitigation proposals.  When a couple individuals spoke-up and asked questions, they were reprimanded to wait to ask their questions at the end of the presentation.

    At the end of the short, non-detailed description of the project, the floor was immediately opened to the public to voice their environmental concerns and what they wanted to have addressed in the Environmental Impact Report (EIR).  They were restricted in only being allowed an arbitrary 3-minutes to speak.  Only 3-minutes to defend their lifelong investments in family, home, and community.

  EIRs shall include identification of all significant effects, alternatives, and potential mitigation measures.
(PRC § 21000-21004)

    At some classy Scoping meetings, a stenographer takes down the public's exact comments to be later transcribed and followed for the EIR's development.  Was this done?  No!  Was an audio recording done?  No!  Well, someone was taking some cursory notes to capture the general jive of the comments.

    For a Scoping meeting, this meeting showed contempt to the public who took their time to attend the meeting not to have their comments properly recorded.  The process was a sham of the California Environmental Quality Act's Scoping purpose and procedure.

    At the end of the meeting, the County's LUSD's Planning Director suggested that speakers should put their comments in writing and send them to the County.  Wrong!  The County, as the Lead Agency for the EIR, conducts the Scoping meeting to inform and solicit/record the public's comments for inclusion into the EIR study.  That is the purpose for the public speaking.  The speakers shouldn't have to resubmit their comments.

  No projects which would cause significant environmental effects should be approved as proposed if there are feasible alternatives or mitigation measures that would lessen those effects.  (PRC § 21000-21004)


    This further illustrates the general contempt that the county's Land Use Services Department has towards the public and the department's internal corruption.

    This is an example of why Newberry Springs should have had a CEQA expert attend the meeting to address the procedure.  Unfortunately, the Newberry CSD board under Paula Deel, Victoria Paulsen, Robert Springer, and Larry Clark, will not release the Kiewit Pacific trust funds to protect the community.

    The community's 14-year old trust funds are apparently being preserved for another purpose.  Would that purpose be to transfer the funds later to the Deel's NSEDA whereupon they can siphon off administration fees for themselves?

Daggett CSD

    Not surprisingly, a failure of leadership of the Daggett CSD board was also apparent.  Despite the proposed 3,500-acre project impacting their own turf, not one Daggett CSD board member spoke during the public session nor raised a question.  Apparently, they didn't have the initiative to do any research in preparation for the meeting.  Scoping is not just for listening to a developer's great sales pitch, but to have questions and concerns ready to have included in the EIR study.

    A Daggett CSD board member had earlier expressed a hope that the Daggett solar project would bring jobs and prosperity.  According to the developer (Sunpower) of the adjacent proposed Newberry Springs Minneola Solar 1 project (1,700-acres), which is one-half the size of the Daggett project (3,500-acres), the Minneola project, "Once operational, 2 - 4 on-site staff are expected at the operations and maintenance facility, personnel will periodically inspect the facility and when necessary personnel will conduct site maintenance, panel washing, or repairs."

    Extrapolating the numbers, the Daggett project will only employ 4 to 8 employees from the general Barstow area.  The Daggett solar project actually represents a loss in jobs when considering the jobs being lost from the number of agricultural fields that the solar project is replacing.

Project Opposition

    During the public's speaking period, not one of the 14 people who spoke came out in support of the project.  The Daggett folks were mostly silent.  It was the Newberry Springs residents who are downwind to the project who presented an unorganized speaker after speaker opposition to the project.  Despite no organization, there was very little overlap and the speakers all had strong, valid points of opposition.

    Nine Newberrians presented a wide range of input.  Two residents from Daggett addressed preservation of Daggett's historical features and water.  One military representative from Ft. Irwin addressed aircraft operations at the airport.  Another speaker suggested that the National Park Service, the BLM, the FAA, and others needed to be consulted.

    One speaker from the Morongo Basin said that a minimum 1-year air study (preferably 2-years plus) was needed to be conducted first for the site to establish a wind and particulate matter baseline for an analysis; and that the Scoping participants sending in written comments to the County should also send a copy to the state's Air Resources Board and the Mojave Desert AQMD.   (Addresses provided below.)

Process Shorted

    At the end of the public comment period, the meeting was closed without allowing for any group question and answer dialogue between the audience and the presenters.  The presenters did stay after the meeting for individual one-on-one conversations but that prevented the public from learning from one another and hearing all of the information.

    This method of audience control is a spinoff of the ideology behind the Delphi Method whereby the presenter divides the audience during a public meeting and limits the amount of information internally shared by those attending.

    The CEQA process is primarily designed to identify and disclose to decision makers and the public the significant environmental impacts of a proposed project prior to its consideration and approval.  That process includes the public having the ability to have their environmental concerns included in the EIR study.

    Unfortunately, in violation of the spirit of CEQA, the public is being denied by the County's Planning Director the necessary time to access and review the hundreds of pages of data in the application which is necessary for the public to understand and fully participate.  But, of course, the County knows that.

    A project with the size and negative impacts of the Daggett solar project requires the County to do a robust Initial Study for the public to understand this project.  The County has refused to do one.  Secrecy and a lack of transparency do not allow full public participation.

    Two Newberry speakers requested a minimum 60-day extension of the Scoping comment period.  The County's LUSD Planning Director, Terri Rahhal, later said that the request would not be honored.  Rahhal wants to cannonball the project through and doesn't want the CEQA process to slow it down.

Daggett Solar Estimated EIR Timetable

LUSD's direction may later cost the County billions.

    Ted Stimpfel, of the Newberry Springs Community Alliance, recommended that the County require a $2-billion, 30-year bond, as protection against future legal claims.  After the meeting, a comment was stated that the dollar amount was ridiculous.  However, in 20 to 30-years, legal awards will probably double.  With the Daggett proposed solar site emitting known cancer-causing, and pulmonary failing crystalline silica, the asbestos attorneys will have a new rich playground.

    When the many hundreds in the class actions are added up and awarded special punitive damages for the County negligence in knowingly permitting these unnecessary Sand Transport Path industrial facilities within neighborhoods, $2-billion will probably fall far short.

    Utility-scale solar developments should not be built in any Sand Transport Path.  Numerous communities in the Silver Valley, Lucerne Valley, and the Morongo Basin are all in Sand Transport Paths.  These facilities will also exacerbate the sand blow upon the railways and highways.

    Solar facilities' disturbance of the desert soil creates massive soil hazards, especially during wind events.  Super small particulate matter (PM10 crystalline silica dust) is lifted and is suspended in the air for days.  These unseen particles when inhaled causes irreversible lung disease and cancer.  Smart attorneys will be going after the deep pocket County and the developers as contributing factors to the deaths and damages from the blowing dust from the solar sites.  The County failed to heed the known dangers and intentionally permitted the deadly hazard.

Deadline to submit comments.

    The deadline to submit written comments for inclusion into the EIR Scoping process is April 26, 2018.  The County LUSD must have the submission by 4:30 P.M.

    Those who spoke at the Scoping meeting might not have their comments fully noted and should submit them in writing.

Ref: Daggett Solar Power Facility (P201700679)

Written Scoping comments should be sent to:

County of San Bernardino
Land Use Services Department
Tom Nievez, Contract Planner
385 N. Arrowhead Avenue, First Floor
San Bernardino, CA 92415
(909) 387-5036

It is strongly suggested that copies be sent to :

Earl Withycombe
California Air Resources Board
P.O. Box 2815 Sacramento, CA 95812
(916) 322-8487

Brad Poiriez, Executive Director/Air Pollution Control Officer
Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District
14306 Park Ave
Victorville, CA 92392
(760) 245-1661

Alan De Salvio, Deputy Director - Operations
Mojave Desert Air Quality Management District
14306 Park Ave
Victorville, CA 92392
(760) 245-1661

Related past news blogs:
Daggett's upcoming scoping meeting April 11th. - 4/9/18
Rebellion grows as Supervisors ignore constituents. - 4/3/18
Newberry families may move for health reasons. - 3/26/18
County increases its liability assisting solar. - 3/17/18
CSD Board's mismanagement may lead to deaths. - 3/11/18
Newberry CSD struggles with solar development. - 3/2/18
Newberry CSD's inaction threatens community. - 2/24/18
Daggett embraces solar development. - 2/21/18
Newberrians attend solar health hazard meeting. - 2/16/18
Communities collaborating for protection. - 2/11/18
Newberry CSD falls short against solar opposition. - 2/4/18
Bombshell transformation to hit the Silver Valley - 1/28/18
Supervisors are engineering destruction of the desert - 1/25/18
Corrupt county leaders are reshaping Newberry - 12/3/17
Lovingood continues damaging votes - 11/6/17

Should you favor more news blogs,
please visit and LIKE our Facebook site.

Click here to read, "Like,"
comment, or share on:
Newberry Springs

Follow us on Twitter and
be notified of new stories:
Newberry Springs Community Alliance

Home page: http://NewberrySpringsInfo.com

© 2018 Ted Stimpfel.   All rights reserved.