Massive renewable energy solar projects are now being planned
for the Silver Valley. The first two will take over 4,700-acres of Daggett
and Newberry Springs. Many more projects that will blanket the Silver
Valley are expected.
The rural lifestyle and community of Newberry Springs will be
decimated by the solar industrialization of the entire Silver Valley.
Supervisors Bob Lovingood and James Ramos have paved the way
for the industrialization of the Silver Valley by removing Policy 4.10 from
the Renewable Energy and Conservation Element last August. The county
Board of Supervisors ordered Policy 4.10 to be reviewed by the Planning
Commission. The county's Land Use Services Department, under Terri
Rahhal, Planning Director, has stalled that order for six months.
More county corruption?
It is reported that Terri Rahhal is not following the
Supervisors orders at the August 8, 2017 Board of Supervisors meeting,
but rewriting Policy 4.10 to favor the developers
and writing additional versions so that "the Planning Commission has
some options." Policy 4.10 was written after many months of
negotiations with the public, why is Terri Rahhal so obstinate to
weaken it? Why is she directing solar to the Silver Valley in
violation of some of the county's solar siting guidelines? Are
the orders coming from the Supervisors?
Newberry CSD appears disoriented.
Newberry Springs is not only fighting apparent corruption
from the county but also from within. Newberry Springs has an uphill
battle in fighting the solar invasion. Stopping the solar advancement
can be done but the Newberry CSD (CSD) appears dumbfounded and confused
about what to do.
At the January 30, 2018, Special Board Meeting regarding
solar called by the CSD Board, Ted Stimpfel of the Newberry Springs Community
Alliance, who has some background experience regarding solar permitting in
San Bernardino County, made a passionate plea that immediate action needs
to be started to prepare for the CEQA Scoping and the presentation before the
Planning Commission. This is a legal procedure and an
should be properly prepared.
Stimpfel warned that solar will kill the rural lifestyle
of Newberry and that there will be an exodus of residents that will not
be replaced. As the enrollment of the Newberry Springs Elementary School
lowers, the school will have to close with the elementary school children being
bused to Yermo. In time, churches will close and the tax based
infrastructure will diminish.
Newberry Springs is situated in a Sand Transport Path.
Pictured above is Harvard Road.
At the January 30th Special Meeting, the only voice supporting
the solar onslaught was Director Larry Clark who opposed a letter of
opposition to solar being sent by the Board to the county and other public
officials. Clark operates a well drilling business that could benefit
from the numerous wells that large solar farm developments require. Due
to the appearance of a strong conflict-of-interest, Clark should have
recused himself from the vote.
Clark is not the only supporter of solar in the
community. It can be expected that about a dozen-plus families
with large alfalfa farms are proponents. With adjudication
limiting more of their water each year, they have been looking for
an exit strategy to leave the valley. All large alfalfa fields
in the Silver Valley can be expected to be converted to solar.
With the solar industrialization of Newberry Springs,
the community's weak residential property values are expected to
plummet. People's retirement nest egg will be damaged.
Stimpfel feels that Newberry Springs has a chance
to successfully defend against the solar development if the CSD acts
decisively and releases the Kiewit Pacific Trust funds for that purpose.
What is the Kiewit Pacific Trust Fund?
In 2004, in
of a clever Conditional Use Permit appeal (extortion plot) brought
by CEQA-NOW, the Newberry CSD, and community individuals against
Kiewit Pacific, the Appellants acquired a legal settlement of about
one-million dollars in benefits for Newberry Springs.
Included was $350,000 in cash.
$20,000 was dedicated upfront by the settlement for the local
fire department. By agreement between CEQA NOW, the CSD,
and various individuals, the CSD was to manage the remaining
funds on behalf of the Appellants for the benefit of the
At the time of the settlement, there were multiple
Appellants. The CSD was considered the best entity to discharge
the Kiewit Pacific "donation" on behalf of the Appellants, so the CSD
accepted the duty in a trustee relationship.
The funds were to remain separate from the CSD's
functions. Except for the upfront $20,000 to the fire department, the
funds were not to be merged into the CSD's general fund that would have
restricted the fund's usage to only those current functions authorized under
being the CSD's support of the fire department, parks and recreation,
and street lighting.
To assist the CSD in the discharge of the funds,
on November 19, 2004, the CSD held a community workshop where 21
ideas for using the funds were developed. Thereafter, the
CSD appointed Fred Stearn, Wes Sperry, Wayne Snively, and John Olson,
to do a communitywide
via the mail and compile the results for guidance in how the
community funds should be used. The 21 ideas from the
workshop were presented to the community to vote upon.
The response was low but provided a cross-section of the
It is important to note that most of the CSD's
suggestions in the survey have nothing to do with the CSD's LAFCO
authorized functions. This further substantiates that the
intent of the funds was not to be solely used for the purposes under
which the CSD is authorized. Comingling of the settlement
funds with the CSD's general fund is not something that CEQA
NOW would have agreed to.
It should be further noted that the Newberry CSD
did very little in the Appeal, rather it was CEQA NOW and the
other Appellants that originated and drove the Appeal on behalf
of the community. It was felt that Kiewit Pacific's new
mining operation owed some benefits to Newberry Springs.
Instead of distributing the funds for the benefit
of the community, the CSD has mostly sat on the funds for 14-years,
with the CSD directors slowly evolving into the belief with passing
time that the funds belong to the CSD solely for the CSD's limited
functions as authorized by LAFCO. This kind of thinking is
Only three authorized expenditures
apparently have been made to distribute portions of the funds.
Two to the fire department and one to the Senior Center. When
totaled and subtracted from the $350,000, it is reported that there
is money unaccounted for. The CSD may have illegally comingled
the missing funds with other CSD expenditures or the money was stolen.
At last report, only slightly over $138-thousand
remain in the trust fund. That appears to represent well over
$100-thousand missing from the trust!
While it is believed that the CSD is not authorized
by LAFCO to handle separate trust funds, the CSD was a party in the
Appeal and the CSD did accept the role in the settlement to handle the
distribution of the settlement funds on behalf of the other Appellants.
This established a fiduciary trustee relationship. If there is
unaccountable money missing, the CSD is responsible for replacing it.
Regardless, the CSD's current management and Board
have nothing to do with the chaos. They inherited the problem.
Highest and Best Use of the funds.
With the proposed incoming solar targeting the community
and with residential property values expected to be nuked, Stimpfel
has asked the CSD Board for the immediate release of the Kiewit Pacific
funds for their highest and best use. That being for the defense
and survival of Newberry Springs.
Stimpfel says that the funds should be applied
to the costs of developing the community's legal opposition action
plan and the preparation of an Administrative Record ("The
Cornerstone of Judicial Review"). He suggests that the CSD
should allocate the funds to be administered by an appointed
community committee, and that both the CSD and CEQA NOW
should have representatives on the committee to supervise the work
and the expenditures.
Newberry CSD Board's inaction
is now damaging the community.
Surprisingly, the Board has appeared to show an
indifference to protecting Newberry. They seemingly want to
hold onto the Kiewit Pacific money and allow the solar industry a
minimum of opposition to Newberry. Director Clark's position
can be understood, but why the other directors?
Undoubtedly, Director Paula Deel would like to see
the Kiewit Pacific funds eventually going to the Newberry Springs Economic
Development Association (NSEDA) that she and her husband controls.
Possibly to that endeavor, she was instrumental in bringing in
Director Victoria Paulsen as an appointment to the CSD Board.
Victoria Paulsen is listed as NSEDA's Secretary. Paulsen is a
good friend of Deel and usually aligns her vote with Deel on the
Deel also has a close friendship with
another director and appears to be building a Board cartel.
In short, the holding back of the Kiewit Pacific funds,
which could be used to protect Newberry Springs, might
be for selfish reasons. The public can draw their
own conclusion but with Newberry Springs on the chopping
block, why should the CSD be holding onto 14-year old
funds that could help to protect the community?
Stimpfel warns that time-is-of-the-essence!
"We are now in a dire emergency," he says, "a tremendous
amount of work needs to be done immediately if Newberry is to be
Letter writing is politically helpful but the
Planning Commission is primarily a legal proceeding where letters
don't matter much, according to Stimpfel. "Critical time
has already been lost, and the CSD's Board doesn't appear capable
of the immediate needed action."
For those not understanding what is currently
going on with the solar lobbists regularly at Lovingood's and
Ramos' offices, Stimpfel might be written-off as an alarmist.
However, some people in the Newberry CSD circle have a high respect
for Chuck Bell of the Lucerne Valley Economic Development Association.
In mid-February 2018, Bell sent an e-mail to representatives of James Ramos
and Bob Lovingood. The following is extracted from that e-mail:
We greatly appreciate Sup. Ramos' and Lovingood's previous letter to BLM opposing North Peak
Wind. And of course the BOS' denial related to the Soda Mt. solar project.
Thus we are perplexed with mixed messages about the BOS'/County's position on RECE -
particularly Section 4.10. It looks like 4.10 might not be going back to the PC/BOS
as originally worded - or maybe as an option - but with a mix of options - focused on design
and project configurations 'consistent/compatible with community standards and plans', etc.
Planning has been 'working with developers' - so far not us. And the community plans used
for 'consistency' determinations would be those in place at the time of project application
acceptance - not the pending, updated community plans not yet approved. In 2007 no one
had an inkling of industrial solar. The best attempts for consistency and compatibility
that could be practically done won't likely work for us. Putting make-up on a porcupine
doesn't mean we want to kiss it.
So how do we deal with the 5000 plus acres of solar projects in LV - with their applications
accepted as complete by the County? 4.10 specifically declared: No industrial scale solar
projects in community plan areas' - not in Rural Living zoning - etc. That was our ace
in the hole to keep them out of our communities - what we all wanted and asked for during the
past 4 years. We thought the County did too with its recommendation for other sites in
the County. But the BOS deleted that section - whether intentionally to provide time to
allow these projects to be filed (that they must have known were in the offing) - that with
4.10 in place their applications wouldn't have been accepted let alone filed - or for some
other reason that we aren't aware of. (We try not to be conspiracy theorists).
BOS publically stated it wanted the PC to review 4.10 before the BOS acted on it - even
though County Counsel supposedly told Planning its wording was consistent with the PC's intent.
But if that was the case - and IF the BOS really wanted to keep these projects out of our
communities - RECE's 4.10 would have gone back to the PC ASAP - and then immediately back
to the BOS for action and likely approval. But that didn't happen and the long period
since its deletion has allowed huge industrial-scale solar projects to be filed in
LV/Daggett/Newberry Springs. There is a strong public effort to get the BOS to
include the original 4.10 in RECE. It still needs to be done and fast - who knows
what else is coming down the line - but unfortunately the barn door has been open too long -
and the applications that have been accepted as complete will be processed and if approved -
will be grandfathered from those 4.10 stipulations.
Whatever the reason for deleting/continuing/prolonging 4.10 - the bottom line reality
is that the County left us with the potential of significantly losing/diluting the essence
of our community identities and land-use integrity. So what do we do now?
Chuck Bell is realizing that the fish isn't smelling right.
The rural communities are being played. Meanwhile, the fight for Newberry Springs is being
lost today by the CSD Board who don't understand what is currently happening.
As the Kiewit Pacific trust fund is outside of the LAFCO powers and do not
involve taxpayer funds, the Newberry CSD Board can release the funds at any time without a
formal notice. Will they quickly stand-up for Newberry?
• • •
Recent letter from Fred Stearn (Newberry Springs)
to the county's contracted solar planner.
• • •
• • •
Related past news blogs:
Daggett embraces solar development. - 2/21/18
Newberrians attend solar health hazard meeting. - 2/16/18
Communities collaborating for protection. - 2/11/18
Newberry CSD falls short against solar opposition. - 2/4/18
Bombshell Transformation To Hit The Silver Valley - 1/28/18
Supervisors Are Engineering Destruction Of The Desert - 1/25/18
Corrupt County Leaders Are Reshaping Newberry - 12/3/17
Lovingood Continues Damaging Votes - 11/6/17
• • •
A new nonpartisan association is forming to
address the Renewable Energy projects in the Silver Valley. Should you or
your organization wish to become an active participating steward in saving the
Silver Valley, please submit your name and/or that of your organization, e-mail
address and phone number to: